{"id":10368,"date":"2026-03-04T09:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-03-04T08:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/?post_type=articles-news&#038;p=10368"},"modified":"2026-03-06T15:33:13","modified_gmt":"2026-03-06T14:33:13","slug":"standard-esim-gsma-a-confronto-sgp-22-vs-sgp-32","status":"publish","type":"articles-news","link":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/articoli-e-notizie\/standard-esim-gsma-a-confronto-sgp-22-vs-sgp-32\/","title":{"rendered":"Standard eSIM GSMA a confronto: SGP.22 vs SGP.32"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Gli standard eSIM GSMA sono progettati secondo modelli operativi profondamente diversi. Mentre <strong>SGP.22<\/strong> \u00e8 pensato per dispositivi consumer dotati di schermo e interazione diretta con l\u2019utente, <strong>SGP.32<\/strong> introduce un\u2019architettura ottimizzata per l\u2019IoT, concepita per implementazioni su larga scala, di lunga durata e senza supervisione. Questo confronto mette in evidenza le principali differenze architetturali, operative e legate al ciclo di vita tra gli standard eSIM consumer e IoT, evidenziando come SGP.32 rappresenti un\u2019evoluzione strutturale verso una connettivit\u00e0 centralizzata, automatizzata e indipendente dall\u2019operatore per le moderne flotte IoT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/M0462-Melitaio-Article-05-Image-1-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-10376\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/M0462-Melitaio-Article-05-Image-1-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.melita.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/M0462-Melitaio-Article-05-Image-1-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.melita.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/M0462-Melitaio-Article-05-Image-1-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.melita.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/M0462-Melitaio-Article-05-Image-1.jpg 1536w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Confronto degli standard eSIM GSMA<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><td><strong>Categoria<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>eSIM (SGP.22)<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>eSIM IoT (SGP.32)<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Standard GSMA<\/td><td>SGP.22 \u2013 Architettura eSIM<\/td><td>SGP.32 \u2013 Architettura eSIM dedicata all\u2019IoT<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Utilizzo ideale<\/td><td>Dispositivi gestiti dall\u2019utente, con schermo e interazione locale<\/td><td>Dispositivi progettati per operare senza interfaccia utente, distribuiti su flotte IoT geograficamente disperse e di lunga durata<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Elementi architetturali chiave<\/td><td>SM-DP+, LPA sul dispositivo. Architettura user-centric, guidata dal dispositivo<\/td><td>eIM, IPA (IPAd o IPAe), SM-DP+. Architettura centralizzata, automatizzata e ottimizzata per l\u2019IoT<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Supporto eUICC<\/td><td>S\u00ec<\/td><td>S\u00ec<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Cambio profilo<\/td><td>Controllato dall\u2019utente; un solo profilo attivo alla volta<\/td><td>Superamento del vendor lock-in, con gestione centralizzata e remota dei profili di connettivit\u00e0 su larga scala<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Remote SIM Provisioning (RSP)<\/td><td>Supportato<\/td><td>Supportato<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Modello RSP<\/td><td>Basato su pull, guidato dall\u2019utente<\/td><td>Guidato dal sistema, completamente remoto<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Dipendenza del trasporto RSP<\/td><td>Sistema operativo del dispositivo, interfaccia utente e interazione dell\u2019utente<\/td><td>Basato su IP (TCP\/IP), compatibile con LPWAN, senza dipendenza da SMS<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Livello di automazione<\/td><td>Basso \u2013 attivazione per singolo dispositivo<\/td><td>Elevato \u2013 automazione zero-touch su scala di flotta<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Idoneit\u00e0 del ciclo di vita<\/td><td>Breve \u2013 cicli di sostituzione tipici del mercato consumer<\/td><td>Lungo \u2013 progettato per implementazioni IoT di 10\u201315+ anni<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Limitazioni principali<\/td><td>Richiede la presenza dell\u2019utente e un\u2019interfaccia<\/td><td>Ecosistema ancora in evoluzione, con adozione in crescita; framework di test, certificazione e conformit\u00e0 in fase di definizione<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Conclusione<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>La scelta tra SGP.22 e SGP.32 \u00e8 determinata meno dal livello di maturit\u00e0 tecnologica e pi\u00f9 dall\u2019obiettivo dell\u2019implementazione. L\u2019eSIM consumer rimane la soluzione ideale per dispositivi user-centric con cicli di sostituzione brevi, mentre SGP.32 \u00e8 progettato specificamente per ambienti IoT industriali, dove longevit\u00e0, automazione e controllo remoto sono elementi fondamentali.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Con la progressiva maturazione dell\u2019ecosistema SGP.32, si gettano le basi per una gestione della connettivit\u00e0 scalabile e completamente automatizzata (zero-touch) in implementazioni IoT distribuite geograficamente, senza dipendere da interfacce di dispositivo o dall\u2019interazione dell\u2019utente finale.<br><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Un confronto pratico tra gli standard GSMA eSIM SGP.22 e SGP.32 che spiega differenze architetturali, livelli di automazione e casi d\u2019uso.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":10376,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","format":"standard","articles-news-categories":[35],"articles-news-technology":[59],"articles-news-industry":[61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72],"class_list":["post-10368","articles-news","type-articles-news","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","articles-news-categories-articolo","articles-news-technology-mobile","articles-news-industry-smart-building","articles-news-industry-transport-and-logistics","articles-news-industry-waste-management","articles-news-industry-construction","articles-news-industry-agriculture","articles-news-industry-retail","articles-news-industry-health","articles-news-industry-manufacturing","articles-news-industry-water-management","articles-news-industry-smart-cities","articles-news-industry-electric-vehicles","articles-news-industry-supply-chain"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n<title>Standard eSIM GSMA a confronto: SGP.22 vs SGP.32 - melita.io<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"A practical comparison of GSMA eSIM standards SGP.22 and SGP.32, explaining architectural differences, automation levels, and suitability for consumer devices versus large-scale IoT deployments.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/articoli-e-notizie\/standard-esim-gsma-a-confronto-sgp-22-vs-sgp-32\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"it_IT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Standard eSIM GSMA a confronto: SGP.22 vs SGP.32 - melita.io\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A practical comparison of GSMA eSIM standards SGP.22 and SGP.32, explaining architectural differences, automation levels, and suitability for consumer devices versus large-scale IoT deployments.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/articoli-e-notizie\/standard-esim-gsma-a-confronto-sgp-22-vs-sgp-32\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"melita.io\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-03-06T14:33:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/M0462-Melitaio-Article-05-Image-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1536\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Tempo di lettura stimato\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minuti\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/articoli-e-notizie\/standard-esim-gsma-a-confronto-sgp-22-vs-sgp-32\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/articoli-e-notizie\/standard-esim-gsma-a-confronto-sgp-22-vs-sgp-32\/\",\"name\":\"Standard eSIM GSMA a confronto: SGP.22 vs SGP.32 - melita.io\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/articoli-e-notizie\/standard-esim-gsma-a-confronto-sgp-22-vs-sgp-32\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/articoli-e-notizie\/standard-esim-gsma-a-confronto-sgp-22-vs-sgp-32\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/M0462-Melitaio-Article-05-Image-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-03-04T08:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-03-06T14:33:13+00:00\",\"description\":\"A practical comparison of GSMA eSIM standards SGP.22 and SGP.32, explaining architectural differences, automation levels, and suitability for consumer devices versus large-scale IoT deployments.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/articoli-e-notizie\/standard-esim-gsma-a-confronto-sgp-22-vs-sgp-32\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"it-IT\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/articoli-e-notizie\/standard-esim-gsma-a-confronto-sgp-22-vs-sgp-32\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"it-IT\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/articoli-e-notizie\/standard-esim-gsma-a-confronto-sgp-22-vs-sgp-32\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/M0462-Melitaio-Article-05-Image-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/M0462-Melitaio-Article-05-Image-1.jpg\",\"width\":1536,\"height\":1024},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/articoli-e-notizie\/standard-esim-gsma-a-confronto-sgp-22-vs-sgp-32\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Articles & News\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/articoli-e-notizie\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Standard eSIM GSMA a confronto: SGP.22 vs SGP.32\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/\",\"name\":\"melita.io\",\"description\":\"La rete di connettivit\u00e0 M2M europea\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"it-IT\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Melita.io\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"it-IT\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/melita-io-logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/melita-io-logo.png\",\"width\":130,\"height\":50,\"caption\":\"Melita.io\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Standard eSIM GSMA a confronto: SGP.22 vs SGP.32 - melita.io","description":"A practical comparison of GSMA eSIM standards SGP.22 and SGP.32, explaining architectural differences, automation levels, and suitability for consumer devices versus large-scale IoT deployments.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/articoli-e-notizie\/standard-esim-gsma-a-confronto-sgp-22-vs-sgp-32\/","og_locale":"it_IT","og_type":"article","og_title":"Standard eSIM GSMA a confronto: SGP.22 vs SGP.32 - melita.io","og_description":"A practical comparison of GSMA eSIM standards SGP.22 and SGP.32, explaining architectural differences, automation levels, and suitability for consumer devices versus large-scale IoT deployments.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/articoli-e-notizie\/standard-esim-gsma-a-confronto-sgp-22-vs-sgp-32\/","og_site_name":"melita.io","article_modified_time":"2026-03-06T14:33:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1536,"height":1024,"url":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/M0462-Melitaio-Article-05-Image-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Tempo di lettura stimato":"3 minuti"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/articoli-e-notizie\/standard-esim-gsma-a-confronto-sgp-22-vs-sgp-32\/","url":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/articoli-e-notizie\/standard-esim-gsma-a-confronto-sgp-22-vs-sgp-32\/","name":"Standard eSIM GSMA a confronto: SGP.22 vs SGP.32 - melita.io","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/articoli-e-notizie\/standard-esim-gsma-a-confronto-sgp-22-vs-sgp-32\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/articoli-e-notizie\/standard-esim-gsma-a-confronto-sgp-22-vs-sgp-32\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/M0462-Melitaio-Article-05-Image-1.jpg","datePublished":"2026-03-04T08:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-03-06T14:33:13+00:00","description":"A practical comparison of GSMA eSIM standards SGP.22 and SGP.32, explaining architectural differences, automation levels, and suitability for consumer devices versus large-scale IoT deployments.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/articoli-e-notizie\/standard-esim-gsma-a-confronto-sgp-22-vs-sgp-32\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"it-IT","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/articoli-e-notizie\/standard-esim-gsma-a-confronto-sgp-22-vs-sgp-32\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"it-IT","@id":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/articoli-e-notizie\/standard-esim-gsma-a-confronto-sgp-22-vs-sgp-32\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/M0462-Melitaio-Article-05-Image-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/M0462-Melitaio-Article-05-Image-1.jpg","width":1536,"height":1024},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/articoli-e-notizie\/standard-esim-gsma-a-confronto-sgp-22-vs-sgp-32\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"home","item":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Articles & News","item":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/articoli-e-notizie\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Standard eSIM GSMA a confronto: SGP.22 vs SGP.32"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/","name":"melita.io","description":"La rete di connettivit\u00e0 M2M europea","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"it-IT"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/#organization","name":"Melita.io","url":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"it-IT","@id":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/melita-io-logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/melita-io-logo.png","width":130,"height":50,"caption":"Melita.io"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/articles-news\/10368","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/articles-news"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/articles-news"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10368"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/articles-news\/10368\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10442,"href":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/articles-news\/10368\/revisions\/10442"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10376"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10368"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"articles-news-categories","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/articles-news-categories?post=10368"},{"taxonomy":"articles-news-technology","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/articles-news-technology?post=10368"},{"taxonomy":"articles-news-industry","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.melita.io\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/articles-news-industry?post=10368"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}